We're releasing the Second Edition of The Rational Restoration soon.
The Second Edition incorporates lots of feedback and contains new sections drawn from posts on https://www.ldshistoricalnarratives.com/ and other blogs.
Here is the summary at the end of Chapter 10: Reframing Scripture:
_____
Summary
When we reframe the Book
of Mormon as an inspired translation of an ancient record that contained “a
history of the aborigines of this country” that was “written and deposited not
far from” Joseph’s home near Palmyra, New York, we have a rational explanation
for all the events and teaching in Church history related to the origin and
setting of the Book of Mormon.
When we reframe the
translation as Joseph described it—that he first translated individual
characters and then the engravings on the plates by means of the Urim and
Thummim that came with the plates—we can see that the
text he dictated was “after the manner of his language.” (D&C 1:24) We then
have a rational explanation for the so-called “errors” such as anachronisms and
quotations from the King James translation, which we would expect if Joseph
translated it. We also understand why the 1840 edition claims it was “Carefully
revised by the translator.”
These rational
explanations provide a sharp contrast to the SITH and M2C theories that require us to ignore or reject
what Joseph and his contemporaries and successors taught about the translation
with the Nephite interpreters known as the Urim and Thummim.
We don’t have to ignore or reject what they taught about Cumorah/Ramah in
western New York.
We can readily identify
extrinsic evidence that corroborates both the origin (translation) and setting
(geography) of the Book of Mormon.
The rational
explanations of the rational restoration lower barriers to acceptance of the
Book of Mormon as another Testament of Jesus Christ.
No comments:
Post a Comment