The recent interview with Ed Goble about the tactics of some well-known LDS scholars/apologists raises the question, why are some LDS scholars/apologists so defensive about their positions? Why do they resort to the tactics Ed described to attack fellow Latter-day Saints who disagree with their theories?
More basically, why do these LDS scholars/apologists resist collaborating on a simple, clear, accurate comparison of the various faithful interpretations of Church history, the scriptures, and the teachings of the prophets?It's a fascinating psychological case that we don't have time to explore deeply here, but we observe that there is a simple, clear and obvious dichotomy of belief among Latter-day Saints.
_____
The dichotomy:
Some of us still believe what Joseph and Oliver taught about the origin and setting of the Book of Mormon.
Some don't.
And that's fine. People can believe whatever they want to believe.
We can summarize it with examples in this table.
Joseph and Oliver |
M2C and SITH |
Responding to
ongoing confusion about the translation, Joseph Smith answered the
question in the Elders Journal in 1838. |
Responding to
ongoing confusion about the translation, some modern LDS scholars/apologists
reject what Joseph taught. |
Joseph Smith:
Question 4th.
How, and where did you obtain the Book of Mormon? Answer.
Moroni, the person who deposited the plates, from whence the Book of Mormon
was translated, in a hill in Manchester, Ontario County, New York,
being dead, and raised again therefrom, appeared unto me and told me where
they were and gave me directions how to obtain them. I obtained them and
the Urim and Thummim with them, by the means of which I translated the plates and
thus came the Book of Mormon. (Elders’
Journal I.3:42 ¶20–43 ¶1) https://www.josephsmithpapers.org/paper-summary/elders-journal-july-1838/10
|
These LDS
scholars/apologists claim that Joseph didn’t use the plates or the Nephite
interpreters, which Joseph and Oliver referred to as the Urim and Thummim.
Instead, they claim Joseph produced the Book of Mormon by reading words that
appeared on a stone he put in a hat. |
Responding to
claims that the Book of Mormon was fiction, Oliver Cowdery answered the
question in the Messenger and Advocate in 1835. |
Responding to
claims that the Book of Mormon was fiction, some modern LDS
scholars/apologists say Oliver and Joseph were wrong about Cumorah because
the “real Cumorah” is in southern Mexico. |
Oliver
Cowdery: I think I am justified in saying that this is the highest hill for
some distance round, and I am certain that its appearance, as it rises so
suddenly from a plain on the north, must attract the notice of the traveller
as he passes by. At about one
mile west rises another ridge of less height, running parallel with the
former, leaving a beautiful vale between. The soil is of the first quality
for the country, and under a state of cultivation, which gives a prospect at
once imposing, when one reflects on the fact, that here, between these
hills, the entire power and national strength of both the Jaredites and
Nephites were destroyed. By turning to
the 529th and 530th pages of the book of
Mormon120 you will read Mormon’s account of the
last great struggle of his people, as they were encamped round this hill
Cumorah… In this valley fell the remaining strength and pride of a once
powerful people, the Nephites—once so highly favored of the Lord, but at that
time in darkness, doomed to suffer extermination by the hand of their
barbarous and uncivilized brethren. From the top of this hill, Mormon, with a
few others, after the battle, gazed with horror upon the mangled remains of
those who, the day before, were filled with anxiety, hope or doubt. https://www.josephsmithpapers.org/paper-summary/history-1834-1836/90
|
According to
these scholars/apologists, Oliver was an ignorant speculator who misled the
Church when he wrote this declaration of fact. How do they
know this? Because they
have interpreted the text of the Book of Mormon as a Mayan codex that,
according to them, means the events took place in Central America. According to
them, this makes New York too far away, so Oliver, Joseph, their
contemporaries and successors must have been wrong all along. |
|
|
For more references, go to https://www.mobom.org/church-history-issues
No comments:
Post a Comment