This Cumorah discussion is not a question of geography as much as it is a question whether we follow the prophets or the intellectuals.
The intellectuals lead people to a land of confusion and chaos. They have consistently and repeatedly taught that there are two Cumorahs (M2C) but the second one is any number of places around the world, depending on which intellectuals you choose to follow.
The choice is clear.
Each of us can make our own choices, but the intellectuals want you to think the choice of which intellectual you follow doesn't really matter, so long as you choose the intellectuals over the prophets.
I've blogged about why it matters here: http://bookofmormonwars.blogspot.com/2017/11/it-doesnt-matter.html Today I have some additional thoughts on the topic.
Remember that the top two reasons Millennials give for leaving the Church are
- “I felt judged or misunderstood.”
- [tied for first] “I did not trust the Church leadership to tell the truth surrounding controversial or historical issues.”
It's a double-whammy.
First, through their censorship of Letter VII and the New York Cumorah generally, the M2C intellectuals don't tell the truth about what prior Church leaders have taught, thereby reinforcing the main reason why Millennials leave the Church.
Second, the M2C intellectuals claim the prophets and apostles are wrong, which, if true, leads people to wonder why we have prophets and apostles in the first place. What can possibly be more destructive to faith than having BYU/CES teachers telling students the prophets and apostles are wrong?
The manual then quotes President Ezra Taft Benson in a paragraph titled Foundation of testimony. “Just as the arch crumbles if the keystone is removed, so does all the Church stand or fall with the truthfulness of the Book of Mormon. The enemies of the Church understand this clearly. This is why they go to such great lengths to try to disprove the Book of Mormon, for if it can be discredited, the Prophet Joseph Smith goes with it. So does our claim to priesthood keys, and revelation, and the restored Church."
One of the early efforts to disprove the Book of Mormon was the book Mormonism Unvailed which was published near Kirtland, Ohio, in 1834. That book claimed Joseph got the Book of Mormon from a fictional work by Solomon Spaulding.
It was partly in response to this effort to discredit the Book of Mormon that President Cowdery wrote Letter VII, declaring the physical and geographical reality of the Book of Mormon. He said it was a fact that the final battles of the Nephites and Jaredites took place in the mile-wide valley west of the Hill Cumorah in New York. He said Mormon's depository (Mormon 6:6) was in the same hill. President Cowdery and Joseph Smith knew the New York hill was the site of the depository because they had actually visited that depository multiple times.
Now it is the M2C LDS intellectuals who seek to discredit President Cowdery.
Preach My Gospel declares, "A central purpose of the Book of Mormon is to convince all people that Jesus is the Christ."
The Book of Mormon is convincing because it is an authentic history of ancient people who lived in America. As President Benson said, the Church stands or falls with the truthfulness of the Book of Mormon.
We have BYU/CES teaching students that the "best fit" for the geography described in the text is a fantasy map. That completely undermines the claim that the book is a true history.
We have BYU/CES teaching students that the prophets and apostles are wrong about Cumorah being in New York. That completely undermines the claim that the prophets and apostles teach the truth.
How can the Book of Mormon convince the world that Jesus is the Christ when our own scholars are trying to convince us that the prophets are wrong and the events took place in a fantasy world?
There is no upside (and no excuse) for choosing the intellectuals over the prophets. The only ones who benefit are the M2C intellectuals who get to confirm their biases all day long while simultaneously acquiring more admirers and followers from their captive audiences at BYU/CES.
As Leo Tolstoy observed,